“I’m not much for marriage, period, wanting to keep the state out of my life, despite the benefits they dangle to entice one into it, but everyone should have access to it if they like. It’s just a civil contract. Not letting some random set of people enter into one is the same as saying blonde people can’t buy property, or tall people can’t get a dog license. It’s just silly to have an arbitrary restriction just because a few crazies are so uneasy about their own sexuality.”
-Balloon Juice commenter Darkness, on the recent California gay marriage decision
UPDATE: Another good one, from the same thread:
“When the Dobsonites talk about family and marriage, they really mean patriarchy. And yes, gay marriage, birth control, women’s rights and so on are a serious challenge to patriarchy and male privilege.
If you can’t successfully condemn and stigmatize the sluts who reject straight male control and the faggots who won’t knuckle under to patriarchal sex roles, then the patriarchal project is facing doom. That, to them, is the death of marriage and godliness.”