Archived entries for Online

Antisocial media

Haven’t been around here very much, if at all. I’ve been posting what random thoughts I had on Facebook, because my group of Facebook friends has become larger than probably even my largest weblog audience, especially since the end of words mean things.

Not sure what to do here. But then, I’m still trying to figure out Twitter and Facebook and LinkedIn and Posterous and Foursquare all the rest – not just for myself, but also for my clients and my current employer. It’s a thicket. But we tend to forget how young all this media stuff is – it’s like trying to figure out the impact of the printed book when you’re friends with Gutenberg. Anyone who tells you they have the answer is bluffing.

Dark and light

At first I didn’t get Facebook – I thought it was just another way to waste time online. And while it is that, it’s so much more. To me, it’s a fascinating sociological experiment where millions of people gather and show off, indirectly, what makes them tick.

I like Facebook status updates especially, because rather than being a vehicle for “I just had soup” sort of life updates that no one (including the writer) would find interesting, they become a sort of personal performance art. What can I say that’s funny, interesting, witty, charming, smart?

It became clear early on that the range of emotions acceptable in a Facebook update message are limited, especially on the dark end of the scale. Being elated over a new job is acceptable, as long as you don’t dwell on it. Your friends might even join in with congratulations, if the mood struck them. But being depressed, angry, or upset? Frowned upon, if not openly mocked.

For a while I didn’t understand why this was. If this was an avenue for expression, why not the whole spectrum? But then I realized: negative emotions aren’t allowed to be openly expressed in “polite” American society at large either – so why would they be allowed on Facebook?

Of course, it can get tiring to hear your friends bitch and moan about their problems in real life. But I think it goes beyond that – to a denial of those dark feelings themselves. After all, if we stick our fingers in our ears and shout “la la la I can’t hear you!” when others are in pain, it’s just one coping technique for helping to deny those feelings in ourselves.

No wonder we’re a society that is addicted to mood-altering substances across the spectrum. We drink, take drugs, smoke and overeat, cocooning ourselves with TV and internet, and fill up credit cards with purchases from infomercials. Where are the connections? I think one reason we find it so hard to connect is that our society tells us to grin and bear it, lest we upset the neighbors.

Expression is painful, messy, and inconvenient. But suppression is infinitely worse.

Lacy, gently-wafting curtains

I used to make fun of people who watched “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” I mean, how stupid, right? But then after “Firefly,” which was brilliant and died way too soon, I thought I should give it a try. I’m glad I did. I haven’t watched the whole series, but I started at the beginning and was continually surprised and impressed. Even the musical episodes were good, even though I generally hate musicals. (I often remember the line from the old ‘Ellen’ show – “I just don’t understand opera. Why do they have to sing everything? Why don’t they just say it?”)

So when I heard that Joss Whedon had been spending his strike-related downtime creating a web series, I knew that I had to check it out.

“Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog” is some of the most entertaining web content I’ve ever seen. All three episodes are online now, but after tomorrow (Sunday) they’ll be gone. I liked it so much that I not only bought the episodes on iTunes, but I’m sure I’ll buy the promised extras-packed DVD.

Neil Patrick Harris (the eponymous Dr.) has left his Doogie days far behind, and it doesn’t hurt that I have a huge crush on Nathan Fillion, who plays Dr. Horrible’s nemesis “Captain Hammer.”

Check this out. Seriously.

Do words still mean things?

Is the era of the personal weblog over? Seems like everything these days is topic-specific: politics, media, celebrities, cooking and food, etc. Does anyone write a popular, interesting site with a mix of personal and public information anymore? In thinking about this new site, I’m struggling with these questions, in ways that I didn’t when I started “words mean things” back in 2000.



Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed. This blog is proudly powered by Wordpress and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez.